Official Proof Democrats hate America thread

This ole grifting commie wh0re doesn't know when to stop with the bs - Video in link
Bernie Sanders @BernieSanders

Elon Musk, the richest guy in the world, is going after USAID, which feeds the poorest people in the world.

Next, he’ll go after the programs that impact you: Medicaid, Medicare, community health centers, Pell Grants, affordable housing.

We can stop him.

GjUbg7cXAAAslLm
 
https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1888413761293140245

WHISTLEBLOWER: USAID HID OPERATIONS FROM TRUMP

A former USAID official says agency staff deliberately kept Trump in the dark, fearing he’d shut down their programs.

In one meeting, they allegedly said, "Let’s make sure he never finds out."

Dr. Mark Moyer claims USAID funneled business to insiders, blocked faith-based groups over politics, and retaliated against anyone who tried to expose corruption.

Even Trump appointees were too scared to challenge the system.

Now, with Elon’s DOGE slashing agencies, USAID’s secrets are unraveling.

The swamp might not be as deep as it thought.

Source: NewsMax
 
Video in link

USAID-FUNDED CEO PREVIOUSLY PUSHED GLOBAL AD CENSORSHIP AT WEF—TARGETING 𝕏

Internews CEO Jeanne Bourgault, whose organization has received $472 million from USAID, previously called for a global ad “exclusion list” at the World Economic Forum—a move eerily similar to the X ad boycott.

Jeanne Bourgault:

“Disinformation makes money. We need to follow that money… and challenge the global advertising industry to focus their ad dollars on 'good' news.”

Her remarks came as major brands pulled ads from 𝕏, aligning perfectly with WEF-backed efforts to strangle free speech online.

USAID has also poured $68 million into the WEF, further tying U.S. taxpayer money to global internet censorship.

They want total narrative control—and you're paying for it.

Source: @KanekoaTheGreat


GjHwLxHWUAEVy1a
 
Last edited:
The Treasury is estimated to have ~23.87% of its budget being used in a fraudulent or wasteful fashion.

GjSpSXUXYAArGg0




We need to stop being the ATM for the entire world.

We have $36 trillion in debt.
We have a $2 trillion annual budget deficit.
We pay over $1 trillion per year in interest payments to service our debt.

We are broke.

GjUx27EXwAAAVXK




These tunnels were built with money from USAID.

GjUL7YMXQAA1_g3
 

FEMA disguised the NGO funding which was done through at least two separate programs.

The amounts designated for illegals (just between the years 2024 and 2023) are huge: $650 million and $364 million respectively.

GjRrcPDW4AAiOh-
 
Elon Musk @elonmusk

To be clear, what the @DOGE team and @USTreasury have jointly agreed makes sense is the following:

- Require that all outgoing government payments have a payment categorization code, which is necessary in order to pass financial audits. This is frequently left blank, making audits almost impossible.

- All payments must also include a rationale for the payment in the comment field, which is currently left blank. Importantly, we are not yet applying ANY judgment to this rationale, but simply requiring that SOME attempt be made to explain the payment more than NOTHING!

- The DO-NOT-PAY list of entities known to be fraudulent or people who are dead or are probable fronts for terrorist organizations or do not match Congressional appropriations must actually be implemented and not ignored. Also, it can currently take up to a year to get on this list, which is far too long. This list should be updated at least weekly, if not daily.

The above super obvious and necessary changes are being implemented by existing, long-time career government employees, not anyone from @DOGE . It is ridiculous that these changes didn’t exist already!

Yesterday, I was told that there are currently over $100B/year of entitlements payments to individuals with no SSN or even a temporary ID number. If accurate, this is extremely suspicious.

When I asked if anyone at Treasury had a rough guess for what percentage of that number is unequivocal and obvious fraud, the consensus in the room was about half, so $50B/year or $1B/week!

This is utterly insane and must be addressed immediately.
 
Elon Musk @elonmusk

To be clear, what the @DOGE team and @USTreasury have jointly agreed makes sense is the following:

- Require that all outgoing government payments have a payment categorization code, which is necessary in order to pass financial audits. This is frequently left blank, making audits almost impossible.

- All payments must also include a rationale for the payment in the comment field, which is currently left blank. Importantly, we are not yet applying ANY judgment to this rationale, but simply requiring that SOME attempt be made to explain the payment more than NOTHING!

- The DO-NOT-PAY list of entities known to be fraudulent or people who are dead or are probable fronts for terrorist organizations or do not match Congressional appropriations must actually be implemented and not ignored. Also, it can currently take up to a year to get on this list, which is far too long. This list should be updated at least weekly, if not daily.

The above super obvious and necessary changes are being implemented by existing, long-time career government employees, not anyone from @DOGE . It is ridiculous that these changes didn’t exist already!

Yesterday, I was told that there are currently over $100B/year of entitlements payments to individuals with no SSN or even a temporary ID number. If accurate, this is extremely suspicious.

When I asked if anyone at Treasury had a rough guess for what percentage of that number is unequivocal and obvious fraud, the consensus in the room was about half, so $50B/year or $1B/week!

This is utterly insane and must be addressed immediately.

Dems: We need 80,000 IRS agents to audit your $600 venmo payment.

Reps: There are over $100B annual entitlement payments to people without social security numbers.

Dems: Auditing is extremely dangerous to our democracy!
 

Joe Biden’s former energy secretary decided to defy the agencies inspector general and give billions of dollars of energy loans to green energy companies in her home state of Michigan.

Why did Biden’s inspector general tell her to suspend the loan? Oh because it’s a massive conflict of interest.

Some of Granholm’s largest campaign benefactors during her Michigan gubernatorial campaign were among the companies receiving these massive last-minute loans.

Joe Biden’s department of energy handed out 100 BILLION dollars of loans to various green energy companies.

100 BILLION dollars.

It would be really nice to see if DOGE can check to make sure those didn’t go to people politically connected with the former administration as a kick back.

Video in link
https://x.com/HawleyMO/status/1780273679969943880
Josh Hawley @HawleyMO

Secretary Granholm insisted to me a year ago she doesn’t trade stock in companies the Energy department regulates. False. She lied about owning stocks and then tried for months to cover it up. Why are all these government officials making on stocks they regulate? Corruption
 
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1888511687126307176

Santiago Josue Baragas Rodriguez, an illegal from Venezuela was arrested 13 times in Chicago.

Most of his charges were dropped by prosecutors.

He was just arrested again for attempted robbery.

GjVXXoTXkAAZUnO
Video in link
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1888558825915232732

Democrats in Chicago have again been caught RELEASING illegal migrant criminals back onto the streets that should have been held for ICE

The Department of Justice is suing Chicago, the state of Illinois and Cook County, “The lawsuit itself cites, quote, information and belief that the conduct of Illinois and Chicago officials has resulted in, quote, countless criminals being released who should have been held for immigration removal.”
 

Obama Judge Temporarily Blocks Musk’s DOGE Access to Important Treasury Dept. Payment System – Orders IMMEDIATE Destruction of ALL Data Obtained Since Trump’s Inauguration
The fix is in.

Let me see if I have this right. The Treasury Secretary CANNOT access any data from the treasury? Wow. Who is afraid the secrets are coming out. This judge was not elected nor was he given the mandate by the people. Enough is enough. WE THE PEOPLE demand transparency. IT IS OUR MONEY, NOT YOURS.

LAWFARE: In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden all of Trump's political appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from accessing Treasury Department data. This ruling, concocted without legal precedent or constitutional justification, is nothing short of judicial sabotage. Worse, it was issued ex parte—meaning Trump administration lawyers weren’t given notice, weren’t allowed to argue, and weren’t even in the room. Only Democrat attorneys general were heard, ensuring a predetermined outcome.

Engelmayer’s order is legally indefensible. He cites no statutory basis because none exists. He offers no constitutional rationale because the Constitution directly contradicts him. Instead, he fabricates a fiction: that the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats—who answer to no voters—control the nation’s finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence.

The implications are staggering. By stripping the executive branch of access to its own financial data, this ruling effectively transfers control of the federal purse to the permanent bureaucracy—the so-called “deep state.” That is a direct assault on the Constitution’s separation of powers, which vests executive authority in the elected President and his appointees, not in career government employees.

This is lawfare at its most brazen: a raw, partisan power grab dressed up in legalese. If allowed to stand, this decision sets the precedent that any left-wing judge can unilaterally strip the President of his authority and hand it to the administrative state. That is not democracy. It is not law. It is judicial dictatorship.

While the order is currently set to last only a week, no serious person believes this won’t be extended if the courts think they can get away with it. The Trump Administration should treat this for what it is—an unconstitutional usurpation—and consider defying it outright. No judge has the authority to cripple the executive branch and hand power to unelected bureaucrats.

Beyond that, the Supreme Court must intervene and overturn this blatant violation of constitutional governance. Judge Engelmayer should be barred from hearing any future cases related to executive authority, and every Democrat lawyer who enabled this attack on the Constitution should be sanctioned.

This is not a legal dispute—it is a coup by the judiciary against the elected government. And it cannot be allowed to stand.

GjSgPrTXcAEwxYV
 
The fix is in.

Let me see if I have this right. The Treasury Secretary CANNOT access any data from the treasury? Wow. Who is afraid the secrets are coming out. This judge was not elected nor was he given the mandate by the people. Enough is enough. WE THE PEOPLE demand transparency. IT IS OUR MONEY, NOT YOURS.

LAWFARE: In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden all of Trump's political appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from accessing Treasury Department data. This ruling, concocted without legal precedent or constitutional justification, is nothing short of judicial sabotage. Worse, it was issued ex parte—meaning Trump administration lawyers weren’t given notice, weren’t allowed to argue, and weren’t even in the room. Only Democrat attorneys general were heard, ensuring a predetermined outcome.

Engelmayer’s order is legally indefensible. He cites no statutory basis because none exists. He offers no constitutional rationale because the Constitution directly contradicts him. Instead, he fabricates a fiction: that the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats—who answer to no voters—control the nation’s finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence.

The implications are staggering. By stripping the executive branch of access to its own financial data, this ruling effectively transfers control of the federal purse to the permanent bureaucracy—the so-called “deep state.” That is a direct assault on the Constitution’s separation of powers, which vests executive authority in the elected President and his appointees, not in career government employees.

This is lawfare at its most brazen: a raw, partisan power grab dressed up in legalese. If allowed to stand, this decision sets the precedent that any left-wing judge can unilaterally strip the President of his authority and hand it to the administrative state. That is not democracy. It is not law. It is judicial dictatorship.

While the order is currently set to last only a week, no serious person believes this won’t be extended if the courts think they can get away with it. The Trump Administration should treat this for what it is—an unconstitutional usurpation—and consider defying it outright. No judge has the authority to cripple the executive branch and hand power to unelected bureaucrats.

Beyond that, the Supreme Court must intervene and overturn this blatant violation of constitutional governance. Judge Engelmayer should be barred from hearing any future cases related to executive authority, and every Democrat lawyer who enabled this attack on the Constitution should be sanctioned.

This is not a legal dispute—it is a coup by the judiciary against the elected government. And it cannot be allowed to stand.

GjSgPrTXcAEwxYV
This was a blatant attempt to to run cover for the back room laundering of our tax dollars. I'd hate to imagine all the things that they are attempting to scrub from the records.
 
This is the same pos cvnt who got busted for lying to Congress - Video in link
https://x.com/WesternLensman/status/1888650566470910304

SUBVERSION?: MSNBC and Fmr. Twitter Exec discuss current and ex-federal employees secretly organizing “push back” on DOGE reforms in their agencies.

Framed by Psaki as “Surviving a Musk takeover” — Rumman Chowdhury details "how to prevent workplace surveillance, how to prevent device surveillance."

The advice centers on techniques to conceal communications between employees that are working together to seemingly subvert DOGE efforts:

“We do have to be careful when we're working with each other to push back."

More "advice” like this is promised from “anonymous” sources, according to Chowdhury.
 
Top