The Pit of Misery: Politics and Religion

WOW! Would you look at that. Now instead of a church mysteriously catching fire it looks like the phenomenon is spreading to mosques.
images
 
SCOTUS rules against Trannies.

Yes, schools CAN separate by biological gender. No you tranny pervs do not have a right to be on the girls' team or in the girls' locker room. Nobody gives a shit about your "pronouns".

Supreme Court makes ruling on trans athletes in women's sports

The Supreme Court has established a new nationwide precedent that allows states to protect women's sports.

The justices ruled in favor of West Virginia and Idaho on Thursday against trans athletes who sued to gain access to girls' sports. The states were backed by the law firm Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), while the trans athletes were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Cooley Legal.

In the highly-anticipated rulings on West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox, the high court upheld state laws requiring student-athletes to compete on sports teams that correspond with their biological sex at birth rather than their gender identity.

West Virginia Attorney General John McCuskey praised the court's decision in a statement to Fox News Digital.

Female athletes speaking outside the US Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. Female athletes speak outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., after justices heard arguments on Jan. 13, 2026, regarding state bans on transgender athletes in women's sports. (Oliver Contreras/AFP)

"This is a monumental victory for every female athlete who has ever competed, or dreamed of competing, on a fair and safe playing field. Today's Supreme Court decision affirms what common sense and the law have long made clear: states have the right to designate sports teams based on biological sex, not gender identity. Without that delineation, Title IX is turned on its head and decades of hard-fought progress to advance female athletes is erased," McCuskey said.

 
As expected the SCOTUS upholds birthright citizenship. Terrible decision.

The children of LEGAL resident aliens, yes. Though I don't like it, you could even argue in favor of the children of tourists legally present in the US. But how are illegal aliens subject to the jurisdiction of the US? If they were, they wouldn't be here. Why should a Guatemalan woman be allowed to waddle over the border, squeeze out a kid and the kid automatically be a US citizen? If that woman trespasses onto your property and squeezes out that kid should the courts require that you leave an equal share of your wealth to that kid as you do your own (ie treat that kid as if he/she were your own)?
 
Top