If you stormed the capital or support those who did, that'd be them. No difference between them and the rioters in cities last summer.
Not to say I disagree with Jefferson:
.
I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.1 Unsuccesful rebellions indeed generally establish the incroachments on the rights of the people which have produced them. An observation of this truth should render honest republican governors so mild in their punishment of rebellions, as not to discourage them too much. It is a medecine necessary for the sound health of government." - Thomas Jefferson to
James Madison, January 30, 1787
https://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/little-rebellionquotation
Read the entire text at the link, if interested.
On the other hand:
Second Amendment, not that many up in here need it:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The far left wants to eliminate that right out of fear, without the individual right to bear arms, forming a well regulated militia is not possible. Lacking that, the storming of the capital was just another riot, no different than what went on in the cities but better covered because of the point of view of the main stream media. After all, the far left does not give a shit about individuals whose homes and businesses were destroyed, but only their agenda.
I'm a libertarian, but my right to swing my arms ends where your nose begins....
www.ammoland.com
