Official Proof Democrats hate America thread

AlaskaGuy said:
Video in link
NEW: Rep Keith Self calls transgender Congress member Sarah McBride "Mister" which then prompted a meltdown from Democrat Rep. Bill Keating.

Self: "I now recognize the representative from Delaware, Mister McBride."

McBride: "Thank you, Madam chair."

Keating: "Mister chairman, you are out of order. Mister chairman, have you no decency? I mean, I've come to know you a little bit, but this is not decent!"

LMAO!

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Chaos Erupts After Transgender Lawmaker 'Sarah' McBride Introduced as "Mr. McBride" - GOP Rep Adjourns Hearing After Democrat Pounds Fist on Desk, Screams (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

The introduction of Congressman Tim "Sarah" McBride as "Mr. McBride" sparked significant backlash, highlighting ongoing tensions in the political landscape surrounding transgender representation. The incident raises critical questions about identity and respect in contemporary discourse.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com

View attachment 34755

View attachment 34754

View attachment 34757
Click to expand...
www.foxnews.com

GOP lawmaker explains why he called trans Dem 'Mr. McBride': 'I don't have to participate in his fantasy'

Rep. Keith Self, who referred to transgender Rep. Sarah McBride, as "Mr. McBride," said he is not obligated to "participate" in McBride's "fantasy."
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
 
AlaskaGuy said:
www.foxnews.com

GOP lawmaker explains why he called trans Dem 'Mr. McBride': 'I don't have to participate in his fantasy'

Rep. Keith Self, who referred to transgender Rep. Sarah McBride, as "Mr. McBride," said he is not obligated to "participate" in McBride's "fantasy."
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...
Videos in links
https://x.com/cspan/status/1900213406931566983
@Rep_McBride (D-DE): "The Republican Party is obsessed with culture war issues. It is weird and it is bizarre."


I appear to live rent free in the minds of some of my Republican colleagues.

I wish that they would spend even a fraction of the time that they spend thinking about me, thinking about how to lower costs for American families.

privacy.jpg
 
www.seattletimes.com

What some WA Democrats want to add to the state constitution

Some Democrats are pushing a parliamentary longshot: asking lawmakers -- late in the session -- to put a constitutional amendment before before voters.
www.seattletimes.com www.seattletimes.com

OLYMPIA — Democratic state lawmakers, worried about federal efforts to limit transgender and abortion rights, want to amend the state constitution to include protections for gender-affirming and reproductive health care, and hope to put it before voters.

Senate Joint Resolution 8204, introduced this week by prime sponsor Sen. Vandana Slatter, D-Bellevue, is backed by 25 of the 30 Senate Democrats.

The move comes at an uncertain time for young trans and gender-fluid people, following a slate of executive orders from the Trump administration to limit transgender rights. At the state level, Republicans in Olympia have raised concerns that Democrats are encouraging children to make gender-affirming health care decisions without their parents.

Slatter introduced the resolution in response to what she sees as national attacks on privacy, freedom, gender-affirming care and reproductive care. Washington has strong and protective laws, she said, and this an opportunity to enshrine them in the state constitution.

In addition to protecting the right to make gender-affirming health care decisions, the joint resolution asserts the state will not interfere with the right to abortion, contraception or the use of assisted reproductive technology.

A joint resolution is a tool for the Legislature to propose an amendment to the state constitution. If both chambers pass the resolution with a two-thirds majority, the amendment is put on the next general election ballot for voters to approve or reject.

Democrats hold the power trifecta in Washington state government but remain a few seats shy of a two-thirds supermajority in the House and Senate. This means even if the joint resolution did make it past some parliamentary obstacles, Democrats would need the support of their Republican colleagues.

Resolutions are subject to the same cutoffs as bills. With the first policy deadlines already passed, SJR 8204 will not be heard this session unless an exception is made to the rules.

Washingtonians have amended the state constitution 109 times. The most recent amendment was in 2019, when voters approved Senate Joint Resolution 8200 to help keep the government operating during large-scale natural disasters.

Other amendments approved by voters include moving up the timeline for redistricting in 2016 and allowing the state’s research universities to invest some of their reserve funds in private companies and stocks in 2012.

The joint resolution was not well received by state Republicans who are already voicing their dissent. The state Senate Republicans social media account called the bill “outrageous” while Rep. Jim Walsh, R-Aberdeen, encouraged constituents on X to sign in “con” on the bill.

Senate Minority Leader John Braun, R-Centralia, said his caucus has “grave concerns” that the proposal would enable full-term abortion or gender-affirming health care regardless of age. He noted it also came as a surprise, because Democrats did not alert them before filing the resolution.

Abortion is legal in Washington until viability, which means the fetus is developed enough to survive outside the womb without medical care. Braun and other opponents of the proposal have alleged the resolution’s vague language would allow abortion “up until the day of birth.”

Slatter said this is not true. The resolution’s language affirms “the right to have an abortion.” The resolution is not an effort write new laws, she said, just to enshrine existing ones.

“We have great laws that we have worked on that use age-appropriate, evidence-based ways of providing care in consultation with doctors and patients that are medically necessary,” Slatter said. She added that laws are backed by decades of research and supported by medical associations.

In Washington, state law generally requires parental consent for most medical care for trans and gender-diverse minors. There are also some types of surgeries that youth normally can’t get until they turn 18, even with parental permission.

A recent executive order from the Trump administration that restricts minors from seeking gender-affirming health care is facing legal pushback in courts throughout the country, including in Washington.

Local advocacy groups and state Attorney General Nick Brown have filed several lawsuits against these Trump orders, citing unconstitutional discrimination, among other claims.

In a case related to protecting funding for pediatric gender-affirming care, led by Brown’s office, a federal judge in Seattle extended a block last week, pausing Trump’s order from taking effect in Washington, as well as in other plaintiff states Oregon, Minnesota and Colorado.

The preliminary injunction should offer temporary protection to health care systems that provide gender-affirming care for youth and allow them to continue their clinical work, Brown said last week.

At the Seattle Children’s gender clinic, where some surgeries and other appointments were temporarily put on hold after the Trump order, the status of many procedures remains unclear — though at least one patient family confirmed their son’s surgery was put back on the schedule late last month.
 
Last edited:
www.thegatewaypundit.com

JUST IN: Radical Mob STORMS Trump Tower---Arrests Are Being Made [VIDEO] | The Gateway Pundit | by Patty McMurray

A pro-Hamas protest escalated into chaos at Trump Tower, leading to multiple arrests as demonstrators clashed over controversial issues surrounding antisemitism and immigration. The unfolding events raise pressing questions about free speech and national security.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com

Video in link
#BREAKING: NYPD is now ARRESTING protestors who took over Trump Tower


 
Funny that ... Clinton and Obama fired thousands of federal employees and nobody said jack sh1t because they knew it was legal.
www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: Radical Clinton Judge BLASTS Trump Admin, Orders Govt to Rehire Thousands of Fired Probationary Employees in Six Federal Agencies | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

A controversial ruling by Judge William Alsup mandates the Trump administration to reinstate tens of thousands of probationary employees across six federal agencies, raising significant implications for federal workforce policies and political dynamics.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com
 
LMAO!

https://x.com/WarlordDilley/status/1900302999450509836
Democrats forgot to stop spamming their bullshit using the dead guys account.

We've reached peak degenerate psyop.

https://x.com/RepRaulGrijalva/status/1900264784110768145
Raul M. Grijalva @RepRaulGrijalva

President Trump’s latest reckless decision to fire thousands of employees at the Department of Education jeopardizes critical student aid programs, weakens protections for students’ civil rights, and undermines essential support for students with disabilities. This move severely threatens every child’s access to a quality education nationwide.

Trump and Musk are prioritizing tax cuts for the wealthy over the future of our students. It’s selfish, and it’s illegal. This radical gutting of the Department will mean funding cuts for every student:

- 26 million kids across every school district—rural, suburban and urban—will lose access to critical funding to help them get succeed.

- 12 million students will lose access to career and technical education, including pathways to good-paying jobs through apprenticeship programs in trades and STEM careers.

- 10 million students from low-income families could lose access to higher education.

- 7.5 million students with Individualized Education Plans—accounting for 15 percent of all students nationwide —will lose access to special education services.

11:16 AM · Mar 13, 2025 - 197.3K Views

Gl8-eOabYAQwHN9


5027626701345_l.jpg
 
Last edited:
AlaskaGuy said:
Funny that ... Clinton and Obama fired thousands of federal employees and nobody said jack sh1t because they knew it was legal.
www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: Radical Clinton Judge BLASTS Trump Admin, Orders Govt to Rehire Thousands of Fired Probationary Employees in Six Federal Agencies | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

A controversial ruling by Judge William Alsup mandates the Trump administration to reinstate tens of thousands of probationary employees across six federal agencies, raising significant implications for federal workforce policies and political dynamics.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com
Click to expand...
Video in link
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1900195644884832404

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D): "We shutting down the government to block federal layoffs."
 
Video in link
https://x.com/amuse/status/1900355474718875656
PARTISANSHIP: The Democrats treated the Kennedy Center as their own private cultural center. They hired their friends to run it and we weren’t welcome. Proof, when JD Vance and his wife walked in the crowd erupted in boos.

www.yahoo.com

JD Vance Booed at Kennedy Center

The vice president was attending a staging of Stravinsky’s Petrushka. JD Vance Booed at Kennedy Center Scoop Harrison
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com
 
Video in link

GRAPHIC: A small child was jumped and viciously beaten by a mob in Baltimore. The child was repeatedly stomped and punched, and was stripped of his clothing.

5 teens have reportedly been charged but police are saying this is NOT a hate crime.

Wonder why this story isn't making national news :unsure:
 
Last edited:
Video in link

LEFT: James O’Keefe exposed Democrats using thousands of addresses to launder fake political donations through ActBlue

RIGHT: Democrat Jasmine Crockett received a $16,000 donation from a 67 year old retired couple with no income. They didn’t make the donation

MONEY LAUNDERING
 
Video in link

Today activist judges

- Ordered the release of illegal migrants back into America
- Told the President of the United States he can’t revoke security clearances of George Soros funded law firm Perkins Coie

And yet, “Article II of the Constitution states that the executive power shall be vested in @POTUS . No court may take over that rule. No court may define or limit the scope of the duties of an official within the Executive Office of the President.”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top