The James Webb Telescope is now fully deployed.

Hey @OldDevilDawg, have you seen this article yet?

James Webb: 'Fully focused' telescope beats expectations

The American space agency has achieved a major milestone in its preparation of the new James Webb Space Telescope.

Engineers say they have now managed to fully focus the $10bn observatory on a test star. The pin-sharp performance is even better than hoped, they add.

To get to this stage, all of Webb's mirrors had to be aligned to tiny fractions of the width of a human hair.

bf31bd776caf2f089f93679cc159d681
 
MarineUKFan said:
Hey @OldDevilDawg, have you seen this article yet?

James Webb: 'Fully focused' telescope beats expectations

The American space agency has achieved a major milestone in its preparation of the new James Webb Space Telescope.

Engineers say they have now managed to fully focus the $10bn observatory on a test star. The pin-sharp performance is even better than hoped, they add.

To get to this stage, all of Webb's mirrors had to be aligned to tiny fractions of the width of a human hair.

bf31bd776caf2f089f93679cc159d681
Click to expand...
Pin sharp? Our luck we'll get confronted by aliens for being peeping toms and taking porno photos in their backyards.🙄
 
MarineUKFan said:
Hey @OldDevilDawg, have you seen this article yet?

James Webb: 'Fully focused' telescope beats expectations

The American space agency has achieved a major milestone in its preparation of the new James Webb Space Telescope.

Engineers say they have now managed to fully focus the $10bn observatory on a test star. The pin-sharp performance is even better than hoped, they add.

To get to this stage, all of Webb's mirrors had to be aligned to tiny fractions of the width of a human hair.

bf31bd776caf2f089f93679cc159d681
Click to expand...

Here’s a scenario that has a non-zero possibility of being accurate:

Poltician 1: Hey guys, lets fund some $10 billion science project that will take pictures of things that no one has ever seen.

Politician 2: Why?

Poltician 1: Because we won’t actually spend the money, we’ll just say that we did. Then we split the money! And if anyone asks to see the pics, we can give them anything! A shitty Photoshop, a lens flare from a JJ Abrams movie, anything we want. Total cost will be 100 bucks tops!

Politician 2: Brilliant! Let‘s do it!
 
Shower Fart said:
Here’s a scenario that has a non-zero possibility of being accurate:

Poltician 1: Hey guys, lets fund some $10 billion science project that will take pictures of things that no one has ever seen.

Politician 2: Why?

Poltician 1: Because we won’t actually spend the money, we’ll just say that we did. Then we split the money! And if anyone asks to see the pics, we can give them anything! A shitty Photoshop, a lens flare from a JJ Abrams movie, anything we want. Total cost will be 100 bucks tops!

Politician 2: Brilliant! Let‘s do it!
Click to expand...
Couldnt we just use 1 billion of it to see Dolly Parton's tits? Before and after AARP membership preferred.
 
OldDevilDawg said:
I been wanting to see them big ole puppies for a vast majority of my life. Where do I donate?
Click to expand...
Ive been wanting to see them since I was weaned off the tit, in hopes I could latch onto hers. There has to be a picture out there somewhere. Someone needs to start a GoFundMe account, tell her its for the good of humanity and it will forever be in the Smithsonian posthumously even. Did I say I really want to see her tits?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top