The Pit of Misery: Politics and Religion

Sweet. The Brandon thing is tough for me. Every time I bring it up, it allows people in the cult to say "SEE, I KNEW IT BOTHERED YOU." I just find it so odd that grown men are using the term and winking like they are in some kind of big club. Maybe that's part of it. Wanting to feel like you belong to something, so you wear your red hat, and you say the same catchphrases you've been instructed to say, and you feel like you're in a cool fraternity. And by "cool fraternity" I mean "a group of old, white men who haven't seen their dicks in a decade."

Let's Go Franklin!
 
Sweet. The Brandon thing is tough for me. Every time I bring it up, it allows people in the cult to say "SEE, I KNEW IT BOTHERED YOU." I just find it so odd that grown men are using the term and winking like they are in some kind of big club. Maybe that's part of it. Wanting to feel like you belong to something, so you wear your red hat, and you say the same catchphrases you've been instructed to say, and you feel like you're in a cool fraternity. And by "cool fraternity" I mean "a group of old, white men who haven't seen their dicks in a decade."
Want to engage in any policy discussions? Or just pretend like you are making fun of other people?
 
Sweet. The Brandon thing is tough for me. Every time I bring it up, it allows people in the cult to say "SEE, I KNEW IT BOTHERED YOU." I just find it so odd that grown men are using the term and winking like they are in some kind of big club. Maybe that's part of it. Wanting to feel like you belong to something, so you wear your red hat, and you say the same catchphrases you've been instructed to say, and you feel like you're in a cool fraternity. And by "cool fraternity" I mean "a group of old, white men who haven't seen their dicks in a decade."
That, or we just find it cheeky. I mean, wow, your response.
 
You should have been around more in 2020 Frank. I felt he should have crushed the riots, for example. Should have prevented the steal, fired Dr.Rat, prevented mail in voting etc etc etc.
"prevented the steal" made me literally laugh out loud. It is hard to face reality that your views are being rejected by the majority of the population. It’s just funny people still want to claim voter fraud. How did Trump’s special election fraud commission fare?
 
"prevented the steal" made me literally laugh out loud. It is hard to face reality that your views are being rejected by the majority of the population. It’s just funny people still want to claim voter fraud. How did Trump’s special election fraud commission fare?
Only engage with me in this if you can be a man and see it through, Franklin.
 
Hey, I can't post on Soundoff anymore (I mean, what's wrong with posting porn?), but who is that BYU Dooshed guy? Is that some kind of act? Wowza it is interesting to see his posts.

I think he's just a troll, to be honest.

Has been actively posting Russian propaganda since this started.

Pro tip; I can hate Biden and still hate Putin at the same time.
 
"prevented the steal" made me literally laugh out loud. It is hard to face reality that your views are being rejected by the majority of the population. It’s just funny people still want to claim voter fraud. How did Trump’s special election fraud commission fare?


While the special counsel’s nearly 150-page report closed with recommendations for the state’s legislative body, Gableman stressed from the get-go that the report did not seek to re-analyze the re-count that occurred in late 2020. Nor was the report’s purpose to challenge certification of the presidential election. Rather, the report represented a small step toward fulfilling “the duty of all citizens of our State and our nation to work hard to secure our democracy for this generation and the next,” the special counsel explained.

From the details exposed in Monday’s special counsel report, the state legislature has much work to do to address “the numerous questionable and unlawful actions of various actors in the 2020 election.” The first unlawful action, according to the report, concerned the payment of grant funds to five Wisconsin counties that were used to facilitate voting. That arrangement, Gableman wrote, violated Wis. Stat. § 12.11, which prohibits election bribery by providing it is illegal to offer anything of value to or for any person in order to induce any elector to go to the polls or vote.

According to the report, Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg providing financing that allowed the Center for Tech and Civic Life to offer nearly $9 million in “Zuck Bucks” to Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha and Green Bay counties. In exchange, the “Zuckerberg 5,” as the report called the counties, in effect, operated Democratic get-out-the-vote efforts. Those grant funds then paid for illegal drop boxes to be placed in Democratic voting strongholds.

The illegal use of drop boxes represented a second area of concern to the special counsel’s office. The report notes state election code limits the manner in which ballots may be cast, providing that an elector must personally mail or deliver his or her ballot to the municipal clerk, except where the law authorizes an agent to act on the behalf of the voter.

The Zuckerberg 5 also violated the federal and state constitutional guarantee of equal protection, according to the special counsel report. The grant money targeted specific voters for special voting privileges, to the disadvantage of similarly situated voters located in other Wisconsin counties. The report also detailed troubling evidence the Zuckerberg 5 counties allowing private groups working with the granting organization, the Center for Tech and Civic Life, to “unlawfully administer aspects of the election,” including in one county where one organization was unlawfully embedded in local government election administration.

The special counsel’s report also highlighted the Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC) illegal directive to clerks to ignore the state election code governing voting in nursing homes. In several nursing home locations throughout the state, 100 percent of registered voters cast a ballot in the 2020 election—an unheard-of rate that included many ineligible voters.

Non-citizen and incapacitated citizens also remained listed on Wisconsin’s voting rolls, in violation of the law, according to the report. Because some non-citizens qualify for driver’s licenses, the law requires non-citizens’ names be removed from the master roll, but that was not done, according to the special counsel. Likewise, individuals declared incompetent must, by law, be removed from the master list, but again that did not occur.

Special Counsel Gableman detailed many other substantial problems with the 2020 election, but equally troubling to the widespread violations of election law established in the report were the attempts by government officials to impede the investigation. Both the Wisconsin Election Commission and the state attorney general “have refused to cooperate with the Legislature’s investigation and actively obstructed it,” according to the report, with a separate appendix detailing how the Office of Special Counsel and the state Assembly have been blocked from investigating portions of the Wisconsin government.
 
Only engage with me in this if you can be a man and see it through, Franklin.

While the special counsel’s nearly 150-page report closed with recommendations for the state’s legislative body, Gableman stressed from the get-go that the report did not seek to re-analyze the re-count that occurred in late 2020. Nor was the report’s purpose to challenge certification of the presidential election. Rather, the report represented a small step toward fulfilling “the duty of all citizens of our State and our nation to work hard to secure our democracy for this generation and the next,” the special counsel explained.

From the details exposed in Monday’s special counsel report, the state legislature has much work to do to address “the numerous questionable and unlawful actions of various actors in the 2020 election.” The first unlawful action, according to the report, concerned the payment of grant funds to five Wisconsin counties that were used to facilitate voting. That arrangement, Gableman wrote, violated Wis. Stat. § 12.11, which prohibits election bribery by providing it is illegal to offer anything of value to or for any person in order to induce any elector to go to the polls or vote.

According to the report, Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg providing financing that allowed the Center for Tech and Civic Life to offer nearly $9 million in “Zuck Bucks” to Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha and Green Bay counties. In exchange, the “Zuckerberg 5,” as the report called the counties, in effect, operated Democratic get-out-the-vote efforts. Those grant funds then paid for illegal drop boxes to be placed in Democratic voting strongholds.

The illegal use of drop boxes represented a second area of concern to the special counsel’s office. The report notes state election code limits the manner in which ballots may be cast, providing that an elector must personally mail or deliver his or her ballot to the municipal clerk, except where the law authorizes an agent to act on the behalf of the voter.

The Zuckerberg 5 also violated the federal and state constitutional guarantee of equal protection, according to the special counsel report. The grant money targeted specific voters for special voting privileges, to the disadvantage of similarly situated voters located in other Wisconsin counties. The report also detailed troubling evidence the Zuckerberg 5 counties allowing private groups working with the granting organization, the Center for Tech and Civic Life, to “unlawfully administer aspects of the election,” including in one county where one organization was unlawfully embedded in local government election administration.

The special counsel’s report also highlighted the Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC) illegal directive to clerks to ignore the state election code governing voting in nursing homes. In several nursing home locations throughout the state, 100 percent of registered voters cast a ballot in the 2020 election—an unheard-of rate that included many ineligible voters.

Non-citizen and incapacitated citizens also remained listed on Wisconsin’s voting rolls, in violation of the law, according to the report. Because some non-citizens qualify for driver’s licenses, the law requires non-citizens’ names be removed from the master roll, but that was not done, according to the special counsel. Likewise, individuals declared incompetent must, by law, be removed from the master list, but again that did not occur.

Special Counsel Gableman detailed many other substantial problems with the 2020 election, but equally troubling to the widespread violations of election law established in the report were the attempts by government officials to impede the investigation. Both the Wisconsin Election Commission and the state attorney general “have refused to cooperate with the Legislature’s investigation and actively obstructed it,” according to the report, with a separate appendix detailing how the Office of Special Counsel and the state Assembly have been blocked from investigating portions of the Wisconsin government.
Time to grow up and deal in reality. You can do it. I believe in you.
 

While the special counsel’s nearly 150-page report closed with recommendations for the state’s legislative body, Gableman stressed from the get-go that the report did not seek to re-analyze the re-count that occurred in late 2020. Nor was the report’s purpose to challenge certification of the presidential election. Rather, the report represented a small step toward fulfilling “the duty of all citizens of our State and our nation to work hard to secure our democracy for this generation and the next,” the special counsel explained.

From the details exposed in Monday’s special counsel report, the state legislature has much work to do to address “the numerous questionable and unlawful actions of various actors in the 2020 election.” The first unlawful action, according to the report, concerned the payment of grant funds to five Wisconsin counties that were used to facilitate voting. That arrangement, Gableman wrote, violated Wis. Stat. § 12.11, which prohibits election bribery by providing it is illegal to offer anything of value to or for any person in order to induce any elector to go to the polls or vote.

According to the report, Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg providing financing that allowed the Center for Tech and Civic Life to offer nearly $9 million in “Zuck Bucks” to Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha and Green Bay counties. In exchange, the “Zuckerberg 5,” as the report called the counties, in effect, operated Democratic get-out-the-vote efforts. Those grant funds then paid for illegal drop boxes to be placed in Democratic voting strongholds.

The illegal use of drop boxes represented a second area of concern to the special counsel’s office. The report notes state election code limits the manner in which ballots may be cast, providing that an elector must personally mail or deliver his or her ballot to the municipal clerk, except where the law authorizes an agent to act on the behalf of the voter.

The Zuckerberg 5 also violated the federal and state constitutional guarantee of equal protection, according to the special counsel report. The grant money targeted specific voters for special voting privileges, to the disadvantage of similarly situated voters located in other Wisconsin counties. The report also detailed troubling evidence the Zuckerberg 5 counties allowing private groups working with the granting organization, the Center for Tech and Civic Life, to “unlawfully administer aspects of the election,” including in one county where one organization was unlawfully embedded in local government election administration.

The special counsel’s report also highlighted the Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC) illegal directive to clerks to ignore the state election code governing voting in nursing homes. In several nursing home locations throughout the state, 100 percent of registered voters cast a ballot in the 2020 election—an unheard-of rate that included many ineligible voters.

Non-citizen and incapacitated citizens also remained listed on Wisconsin’s voting rolls, in violation of the law, according to the report. Because some non-citizens qualify for driver’s licenses, the law requires non-citizens’ names be removed from the master roll, but that was not done, according to the special counsel. Likewise, individuals declared incompetent must, by law, be removed from the master list, but again that did not occur.

Special Counsel Gableman detailed many other substantial problems with the 2020 election, but equally troubling to the widespread violations of election law established in the report were the attempts by government officials to impede the investigation. Both the Wisconsin Election Commission and the state attorney general “have refused to cooperate with the Legislature’s investigation and actively obstructed it,” according to the report, with a separate appendix detailing how the Office of Special Counsel and the state Assembly have been blocked from investigating portions of the Wisconsin government.
Cliff notes please.
 
Time to grow up and deal in reality. You can do it. I believe in you.

I can do it, can you?

So you can refute any of that?

Funny, because they were taking a victory lap in Time Magazine for the way they manipulated the election.



That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.
 
Cliff notes please.

Zuckerberg and other wealthy tech elites bypassed the campaign contribution laws by investing millions of dollars into the Center for Tech and Civic Life , under the auspices of assisting with the vote, but in reality infiltrated local electoral offices in democratic areas of battleground elections states and canvassed the area, 'assisting' people, to include ineligible voters, in registering for mail in votes, setting up illegal drop boxes, and then harvesting those ballots and delivering them to those drop boxes.

Don't worry, Soros judges will keep it from going anywhere.
 
I can do it, can you?

So you can refute any of that?

Funny, because they were taking a victory lap in Time Magazine for the way they manipulated the election.



That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.
I laugh when people link that Time article. I'd wager my life you did not read it. OH MY GOD YOU GUYS THEY'S PUTTING THEIR EVIL PLANS RIGHT IN A MAGAZINE NO FOOLIN!
 
Zuckerberg and other wealthy tech elites bypassed the campaign contribution laws by investing millions of dollars into the Center for Tech and Civic Life , under the auspices of assisting with the vote, but in reality infiltrated local electoral offices in democratic areas of battleground elections states and canvassed the area, 'assisting' people, to include ineligible voters, in registering for mail in votes, setting up illegal drop boxes, and then harvesting those ballots and delivering them to those drop boxes.

Don't worry, Soros judges will keep it from going anywhere.
Right on, my patriot brother in Christ. Makes me fucking sick when people try to get more people to vote. Absolutely sick.
 
Top