Interesting

Here is my post from the Chevron thread:

Scotus has decided to take up a case whereas herring fishermen must have federal monitors on their ships and pay the salary and expenses for the monitors. I know this is a CBS link but it is actually well written and informative. I have long called for every regulation passed by an agency to be approved by Congress before it could take effect and we are inching closer to that goal. I read, cannot find the link, that Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has recused herself because she heard the case at the Appellate Court level. Some notable clips from the article:

The proposal included provisions that required vessel owners, for some trips, to arrange for monitoring and pay for the services rendered on a given trip.

While serving on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, Gorsuch wrote in 2016 that Chevron "seems no less than a judge-made doctrine for the abdication of the judicial duty." In 2022, he wrote that the Chevron doctrine "deserves a tombstone no one can miss."

Thomas, too, has been critical of the Chevron decision, writing in a 2015 concurrence that it "wrests from courts the ultimate interpretative authority to 'say what the law is' and hands it over to the Executive."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top