Christopher Lane Foote. The best inside joke?

Long Time Sooner said:
Christopher Foote was the poster equivalent of the batshit crazy guy in A Beautiful Mind that was crossbred with the 1984 BYU Tigers.
Click to expand...
I resolved, satisfactorily, several issues pertaining to the national championship. Actually, none of you half-wits came even remotely close to doing it. Rather than ridiculing me for doing the appropriate thing, maybe you ought to alter your perspective to accomodate what I did. Relatively few have delivered to the extent I have. Not that I necessarily care about conventional wisdom. I got it right. I reinvented the wheel. I think that merits some measure of acclimation. But even if none agree, it doesnt matter that much to me. I dont appropriate a national championship. I never have and I never will.
 
Kace-1 said:
I always liked how he typed UCLA as U.C.L.A., but kept BYU as BYU. Shit like that takes effort.
Click to expand...
U.C.L.A. was the Belt Champion in 1984. Brigham Young University co-championed the national title. Iowa shared in the accomplishment. To the necessary level. 1/3. Meaning its a co-championship. They tie. Actually that isnt opinion.
 
OldDevilDawg said:
If you can explain that insanity, you are the smartest fucker on the internet.
Click to expand...
The insanity that is CFP? Not difficult to follow. Quite simple, actually. As is relative proficiency. 100% relative proficiency defines a national champion. If you have a hard time understanding that, I feel sorry for you. It doesnt get much simpler. The formula is simple, too. Not difficult. The Belt is a simple logistic used to transfer title to another. It doesnt get any simpler. My explanations are opaque. For that I apologise. But the Belt is dick-simple. Not hard. Easy. Dont stard callimg me out if the problem rests in either your ineptiude or lack of civility. And I am the proprietor of neither one. Which is kind of funny if you think about it. You asswipes are blaming ME for something Im not responsible for. Dont shoot the messenger. Follow?
 
CollegeFBFan2021 said:
The insanity that is CFP? Not difficult to follow. Quite simple, actually. As is relative proficiency. 100% relative proficiency defines a national champion. If you have a hard time understanding that, I feel sorry for you. It doesnt get much simpler. The formula is simple, too. Not difficult. The Belt is a simple logistic used to transfer title to another. It doesnt get any simpler. My explanations are opaque. For that I apologise. But the Belt is dick-simple. Not hard. Easy. Dont stard callimg me out if the problem rests in either your ineptiude or lack of civility. And I am the proprietor of neither one. Which is kind of funny if you think about it. You asswipes are blaming ME for something Im not responsible for. Dont shoot the messenger. Follow?
Click to expand...

Oh, I understand the English language well enough. I'm pretty decent at spelling it, too. For the life of me, my 143 IQ sees a complete question mark every time you go on a scatterbrained posting binge with a wall of posts about belts, relative proficiency, and BYU. You do it in threads that have absolutely nothing to do with your obsession. All I did was ask you to explain yourself. Quite frankly, you failed.

You do know the definition of insanity, right?

"Doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result."
 
OldDevilDawg said:
Oh, I understand the English language well enough. I'm pretty decent at spelling it, too. For the life of me, my 143 IQ sees a complete question mark every time you go on a scatterbrained posting binge with a wall of posts about belts, relative proficiency, and BYU. You do it in threads that have absolutely nothing to do with your obsession. All I did was ask you to explain yourself. Quite frankly, you failed.

You do know the definition of insanity, right?

"Doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result."
Click to expand...
I wasnt responding to you, but since you are the first to make the attempt Ill give you the benefit of the doubt. Relative proficiency isnt my invention. I never said it was. It happens to be the basis for a national championship I thought warranted investigation. The New York Times. I think Ive mentioned that before. I dont work for the New York Times. Never have, and never will, either. I couldnt guess about I.Q. 143 isnt exceptional. Not to diminish it. 143 says something about your intelligence. Relative proficiency goes to 100. The difference is by MY scale 100 is exceptional. You remind me of Donald Trump. You are elevating yourself beyond the norm. To little effect. I dont gauge intelligence. Not especially interested in it.
 
CollegeFBFan2021 said:
I wasnt responding to you, but since you are the first to make the attempt Ill give you the benefit of the doubt. Relative proficiency isnt my invention. I never said it was. It happens to be the basis for a national championship I thought warranted investigation. The New York Times. I think Ive mentioned that before. I dont work for the New York Times. Never have, and never will, either. I couldnt guess about I.Q. 143 isnt exceptional. Not to diminish it. 143 says something about your intelligence. Relative proficiency goes to 100. The difference is by MY scale 100 is exceptional. You remind me of Donald Trump. You are elevating yourself beyond the norm. To little effect. I dont gauge intelligence. Not especially interested in it.
Click to expand...

Dude, you quoted my post. If you weren't responding to me, why would you do that? Help me out here, I'm just the dumbass trying to understand your insane obsession.
 
OldDevilDawg said:
Dude, you quoted my post. If you weren't responding to me, why would you do that? Help me out here, I'm just the dumbass trying to understand your insane obsession.
Click to expand...
I have a disorder. I dont remember taking anything out of context. You said, twice, I think. That I have insanity. Thats not a very nice way to communicate. I have obsessive compulsive disorder. OCD. Sort of like Raymond Babbit. Rain Man. I havent been especially succesful. But I know what Im doing. 1984 i mention as an example of how thinking outside of the box, insanity, can lead to a consensus of opinion about what a legitimate claim IS! It includes mention of relative proficiency. The New York Times appropriates it. Not I. If someone is INSANE its them, not I. I am the messenger. I dont work for the New York Times. I never have. Relative proficiency isnt my metric. It never was. I am the messenger and its fifteem minutes to Wapner! Uh, oh.
 
Heres the truth, at least as I see it. We could abandon conventional wisdom. Some say it is necessary to move forward. I disagree. Vehdmently. I am progressive. You want a reasonable solution to CFP? Ill give you the solution, free of charge. Move it (championshhip bracket) apart from the bowls. Admit four teams, post-season. All conference champions. Ball St. advances. Coastal Carolina vs. Cincinnati advdances. Alabama advances. Ohio St. advances. Easy Peasy.
 
tinp said:
The lesser known post where he published his phone number and talked about....well.....talked about who the fuck knows what:

If someone wants to do that you can call me directly, and we can arrange a meeting of the minds. Or, simply STFU. (719) 505-5038. At least Adolf Hitler could read. And write, too. You don't have to like it, but he was literate, not without any aptitude, as you are. Sure, he was a dictator, but he was persuasive. And not altogether stupid,
Click to expand...
That was an invitation, dont you know? Mamas house still stands firmly erected. Relative proficiency selected a deserving champion (one, only) this year! Any guesses which team that was? Belt protocol played a pivotal role, as usual, selecting a deserving champion. Yeah. Youre right. Im F.O.F.S. Nothing I say makes any sense, whatsoever. BYU wasnt deserving of a NC. Florida merited it, instead. Both years! Even though cumulative R.P.(Iowas share) when added to Brigham Youngs measly 2/3 comparitively, puts them right at 100%. (96% to be precise). Still insufficient to exclude the Gators, but who is pushing for their exclusion? Not me! They are a national champion. My national champion. The New York Times Champion. But not CFPs. Thats U.C.L.A. A,k.a. The National Belt Championship. U.C.L.A. In 1996 its BYU. Darn the luck! Whats it going to take to unite a N.C? Maybe we shoule leave well enough alone?
 
CollegeFBFan2021 said:
That was an invitation, dont you know? Mamas house still stands firmly erected. Relative proficiency selected a deserving champion (one, only) this year! Any guesses which team that was? Belt protocol played a pivotal role, as usual, selecting a deserving champion. Yeah. Youre right. Im F.O.F.S. Nothing I say makes any sense, whatsoever. BYU wasnt deserving of a NC. Florida merited it, instead. Both years! Even though cumulative R.P.(Iowas share) when added to Brigham Youngs measly 2/3 comparitively, puts them right at 100%. (96% to be precise). Still insufficient to exclude the Gators, but who is pushing for their exclusion? Not me! They are a national champion. My national champion. The New York Times Champion. But not CFPs. Thats U.C.L.A. A,k.a. The National Belt Championship. U.C.L.A. In 1996 its BYU. Darn the luck! Whats it going to take to unite a N.C? Maybe we shoule leave well enough alone?
Click to expand...
Yes
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top