Colekibler
Member
- Messages
- 36
Bleacher Report has released their updated QBU rankings. While they made some good points, the list seems utterly unrealistic. It goes as follows:
1. Purdue
2. Michigan
3. NC State
Honorable Mention:
Washington, Oklahoma, USC, Stanford, California, Oregon, Notre Dame, Miami
Now every school there definitely has some QB talent to boast about but there is no reason Michigan should be number 2. Purdue can’t be number 1. Purdue has a very solid resume with QBs historically, but nothing recent. Can one really say Miami has a deeper and more successful QB history than Michigan State?
All in all, I read these Bleacher Report or ESPN articles and I wonder how so many people disagree with them, and they are widely proven wrong, but they continue to have high profile jobs??
1. Purdue
2. Michigan
3. NC State
Honorable Mention:
Washington, Oklahoma, USC, Stanford, California, Oregon, Notre Dame, Miami
Now every school there definitely has some QB talent to boast about but there is no reason Michigan should be number 2. Purdue can’t be number 1. Purdue has a very solid resume with QBs historically, but nothing recent. Can one really say Miami has a deeper and more successful QB history than Michigan State?
All in all, I read these Bleacher Report or ESPN articles and I wonder how so many people disagree with them, and they are widely proven wrong, but they continue to have high profile jobs??