Russia v Ukraine just began 6 mins ago

NATO is a joke these days. It's the US and a bunch of nobody's other than the Brits and Poles who both still have a substantial military. Woke western Europe went down the sh1tter along time ago military wise.

Here's an example of where most NATO countries are at.


Knowing this, Trump told NATO to start paying their promised 2% of GDP towards defense spending and this is how the establishment media treated him.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/12/10/trumps-nato-parade-false-facts-misstatements/
Trump’s NATO parade of falsehoods and misstatements

And after Russia invaded Ukraine this last time this is what happened.


nato1.jpg

Gotta' love Poland. They came to play...
 
The Battle of Vienna vs the dirty Turks.

Yep...Polish King Jan III Sobieski lead the largest cavalry charge in history.


"Venimus, vidimus, Deus vincit ” – we came, we saw, God conquered."


During the summer of 1683, the Ottoman Turks were besieging Vienna. They were a few days away from conquering the capital of Austria. But then the winged hussars arrived at the battlefield. They led the biggest cavalry charge in history. The winged hussars unleashed havoc upon the disciplined Ottoman Janissaries. Christian Europe was safe from the Muslim threat.


Besides the famous Battle of Vienna in 1683, the winged hussars won most of the battles they fought.

In 1610 at the Battle of Klushino, 5.000 winged hussars defeated the Russian army of 35.000 soldiers.

In 1621 at the Battle of Chocim, 45.000 Poles repelled the invasion of 170.000 Ottoman Turks. The Poles entrenched themselves and the Ottomans laid the siege. However, the winged hussars’ counterattacks were devastating to the Ottoman army. On one occasion, 600 winged hussars charged against 10.000 Ottomans. They broke their lines and drove the Ottoman Janissaries back to their camp.

In 1694 at the Battle of Hodów, 400 winged hussars stood up against the 40.000 Crimean Tatars and defeated them. The Poles nicknamed the battle the ‘Polish Thermopylae’.


The first encounter took place on the fields near Hodów. The 400-strong Polish cavalry charged the 700-strong Tatar vanguard and made them withdraw. Shortly afterwards the Polish forces retreated to Hodów due to overwhelming enemy numbers, and proceeded to fortify themselves using heavy wooden fences left there from earlier Tatar invasions. For the next 6 hours Polish troops resisted relentless Tatar attacks. Even after the Poles ran out of bullets, they continued to fire at the enemy, using Tatar arrowheads as improvised ammunition for their guns.[13]

Unable to defeat the Poles, the Tatars sent Polish-speaking Lipka Tatars to convince the Polish troops to surrender.[14] When the Polish commander replied "Come and get us if you can", the Tatars withdrew to Kamieniec Podolski and gave up on the entire raid, having gained nearly nothing despite large troop losses and vast numerical advantage.
 
Last edited:
I really hope I am wrong but I think Russia is trying to bait the U.S into it so that when China moves on Taiwan we will be fighting on 2 fronts. I believe this is why Russia has been taking so long, acting bogged down, attacking civilian targets, trying to goad us and nato into retaliation. And if Ukraine dosen't work a neighboring nato country will. I'm of the assumption that Russia has hardly put forth any real effort, they are just using Ukraine as a pawn, and China is using Russia as one for world domination. Let Russia burn their military up first, while in turn burning the USA's as well.
All while buying time for Iran and North Korea.

but, it’s cool, Jack! Biden! He’s got this, chief!
 
Agree 100% ^^ ... but know this ... this war could have been avoided if the US (Democrats and RINO's) hadn't meddled in Ukraine politics. It started with Bush Jr and Soros (Orange Revolution) and continued with Obama (US funded Maidan Revolution) and they kept it up. Zelensky is a slimeball who had his political opponents arrested right after he was elected and followed it up by shutting down media outlets that criticized him. He kept taking US money while the US expanded its military training bases in western Ukraine and all the while the US establishment knew there was a chance of repercussion from Putin just like there was in 2014. Never forget that it was the US embassy in Ukraine who fvcked Trump the hardest during the fake impeachment.
This, exactly. I'm no fan of Putin, obviously, but Zelensky shouldn't be trusted either. People heralding him as a leader of democracy and freedom overlook the authoritarian steps he'd taken in his own country for a while. Ukrainian government is corrupt as they come.
 
Yep...Polish King Jan III Sobieski lead the largest cavalry charge in history.


"Venimus, vidimus, Deus vincit ” – we came, we saw, God conquered."


During the summer of 1683, the Ottoman Turks were besieging Vienna. They were a few days away from conquering the capital of Austria. But then the winged hussars arrived at the battlefield. They led the biggest cavalry charge in history. The winged hussars unleashed havoc upon the disciplined Ottoman Janissaries. Christian Europe was safe from the Muslim threat.


Besides the famous Battle of Vienna in 1683, the winged hussars won most of the battles they fought.

In 1610 at the Battle of Klushino, 5.000 winged hussars defeated the Russian army of 35.000 soldiers.

In 1621 at the Battle of Chocim, 45.000 Poles repelled the invasion of 170.000 Ottoman Turks. The Poles entrenched themselves and the Ottomans laid the siege. However, the winged hussars’ counterattacks were devastating to the Ottoman army. On one occasion, 600 winged hussars charged against 10.000 Ottomans. They broke their lines and drove the Ottoman Janissaries back to their camp.

In 1694 at the Battle of Hodów, 400 winged hussars stood up against the 40.000 Crimean Tatars and defeated them. The Poles nicknamed the battle the ‘Polish Thermopylae’.


The first encounter took place on the fields near Hodów. The 400-strong Polish cavalry charged the 700-strong Tatar vanguard and made them withdraw. Shortly afterwards the Polish forces retreated to Hodów due to overwhelming enemy numbers, and proceeded to fortify themselves using heavy wooden fences left there from earlier Tatar invasions. For the next 6 hours Polish troops resisted relentless Tatar attacks. Even after the Poles ran out of bullets, they continued to fire at the enemy, using Tatar arrowheads as improvised ammunition for their guns.[13]

Unable to defeat the Poles, the Tatars sent Polish-speaking Lipka Tatars to convince the Polish troops to surrender.[14] When the Polish commander replied "Come and get us if you can", the Tatars withdrew to Kamieniec Podolski and gave up on the entire raid, having gained nearly nothing despite large troop losses and vast numerical advantage.
Simply incredible and fascinating, thanks.
 

A Russian soldier reportedly drove over his colonel with a tank — while two other service members were caught venting about strongman Vladimir Putin’s “bulls—” invasion of Ukraine amid reports of heavy losses.

The Russian soldier who was behind the wheel of the tank “blamed the commander of the group, Col. Yury Medvedev, for the deaths of his friends,” Ukrainian journalist Roman Tsimbalyuk said on Facebook.

“Having waited for the right moment, during battle, he ran over the commander with a tank as he stood next to him, injuring both his legs,” he wrote, the Daily Beast reported.

“Now Col. Medvedev is in a hospital in Belarus, waiting for monetary compensation for combat wounds received during the ‘special military operation to protect the Donbass.’ Colonel Medvedev was awarded the Order of Courage,” he wrote.

Although there was no independent corroboration of the claim, footage released by Chechen leader and close Putin ally Ramzan Kadyrov showed Medvedev being transported to a hospital.
 
The New York Times
How Europe Got Hooked on Russian Gas Despite Reagan's Warnings


Hiroko Tabuchi
Wed, March 23, 2022, 7:46 AM


The language in the CIA memo was unequivocal: The 3,500-mile gas pipeline from Siberia to Germany is a direct threat to the future of Western Europe, creating “serious repercussions” from a dangerous reliance on Russian fuel.
The agency wasn’t briefing President Joe Biden today. It was advising President Ronald Reagan more than four decades ago.
The memo was prescient. That Soviet-era pipeline, the subject of a bitter fight during the Reagan administration, marked the start of Europe’s heavy dependence on Russian natural gas to heat homes and fuel industry. However, those gas purchases now help fund Vladimir Putin’s war machine in Ukraine, despite worldwide condemnation of the attacks and global efforts to punish Russia financially.
Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times
In 1981, Reagan imposed sanctions to try to block the pipeline, a major Soviet initiative designed to carry huge amounts of fuel to America’s critical allies in Europe. But he swiftly faced stiff opposition — not just from the Kremlin and European nations eager for a cheap source of gas, but also from a powerful lobby close to home: oil and gas companies that stood to profit from access to Russia’s gargantuan gas reserves.
In a public-relations and lobbying blitz that played out across newspaper opinion pages, congressional committees and a direct appeal to the White House, industry executives and lobbyists fought the sanctions. “Reagan has absolutely no reason to forbid this business,” Wolfgang Oehme, chairman of an Exxon subsidiary with a stake in the pipeline, said at the time.
Those efforts, nearly a half-century ago, show how some of the world’s largest oil and gas companies played a critical role in opening up Russia’s reserves by opposing sanctions and advocating for business interests over national security, human rights or environmental concerns.
Today, Europe’s reliance on Russia’s gas has put European nations in a compromised position: They continue to purchase Russian energy, transferring enormous sums of money to Moscow, which fund a Russian invasion that they denounce.
Reagan’s effort to block the pipeline decades ago, which ultimately failed, also laid the foundations for a huge build-out of natural gas, which is now hindering Europe’s attempts to tackle climate change. Even as natural gas has helped to replace dirtier coal, the pipelines and other gas infrastructure that followed have effectively committed Europe to a reliance on gas that not only continues today, but remains difficult to unravel even in a moment of global unity against Russian aggression.
“The Soviet Union is a superpower that really emerged on the back of its oil and gas exports,” said Agnia Grigas, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and an expert on the security and energy issues of Russia and the former Soviet states. “Nothing has changed.”
In the face of opposition both at home and abroad, Reagan in 1982 reversed the sanctions, which had stopped U.S. companies from supplying or participating in the project. The pipeline from Siberia to West Germany opened two years later.

There's more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/europe-got-hooked-russian-gas-114602420.html

The last great American President IMO....
 
The New York Times
How Europe Got Hooked on Russian Gas Despite Reagan's Warnings


Hiroko Tabuchi
Wed, March 23, 2022, 7:46 AM


The language in the CIA memo was unequivocal: The 3,500-mile gas pipeline from Siberia to Germany is a direct threat to the future of Western Europe, creating “serious repercussions” from a dangerous reliance on Russian fuel.
The agency wasn’t briefing President Joe Biden today. It was advising President Ronald Reagan more than four decades ago.
The memo was prescient. That Soviet-era pipeline, the subject of a bitter fight during the Reagan administration, marked the start of Europe’s heavy dependence on Russian natural gas to heat homes and fuel industry. However, those gas purchases now help fund Vladimir Putin’s war machine in Ukraine, despite worldwide condemnation of the attacks and global efforts to punish Russia financially.
Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times
In 1981, Reagan imposed sanctions to try to block the pipeline, a major Soviet initiative designed to carry huge amounts of fuel to America’s critical allies in Europe. But he swiftly faced stiff opposition — not just from the Kremlin and European nations eager for a cheap source of gas, but also from a powerful lobby close to home: oil and gas companies that stood to profit from access to Russia’s gargantuan gas reserves.
In a public-relations and lobbying blitz that played out across newspaper opinion pages, congressional committees and a direct appeal to the White House, industry executives and lobbyists fought the sanctions. “Reagan has absolutely no reason to forbid this business,” Wolfgang Oehme, chairman of an Exxon subsidiary with a stake in the pipeline, said at the time.
Those efforts, nearly a half-century ago, show how some of the world’s largest oil and gas companies played a critical role in opening up Russia’s reserves by opposing sanctions and advocating for business interests over national security, human rights or environmental concerns.
Today, Europe’s reliance on Russia’s gas has put European nations in a compromised position: They continue to purchase Russian energy, transferring enormous sums of money to Moscow, which fund a Russian invasion that they denounce.
Reagan’s effort to block the pipeline decades ago, which ultimately failed, also laid the foundations for a huge build-out of natural gas, which is now hindering Europe’s attempts to tackle climate change. Even as natural gas has helped to replace dirtier coal, the pipelines and other gas infrastructure that followed have effectively committed Europe to a reliance on gas that not only continues today, but remains difficult to unravel even in a moment of global unity against Russian aggression.
“The Soviet Union is a superpower that really emerged on the back of its oil and gas exports,” said Agnia Grigas, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and an expert on the security and energy issues of Russia and the former Soviet states. “Nothing has changed.”
In the face of opposition both at home and abroad, Reagan in 1982 reversed the sanctions, which had stopped U.S. companies from supplying or participating in the project. The pipeline from Siberia to West Germany opened two years later.

There's more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/europe-got-hooked-russian-gas-114602420.html

The last great American President IMO....

Reagan was the closest we ever came to having a libertarian president. IMO, he was the greatest ever. He was the only Commander-In-Chief that I would have followed to my grave.
 
Reagan was the closest we ever came to having a libertarian president. IMO, he was the greatest ever. He was the only Commander-In-Chief that I would have followed to my grave.

I agree. We are fortunate to live in a country which can be self sufficient if need be. Having the political will to make that happen is a different story. Other countries are not so fortunate and/or have depended on sources that can and will cripple them for denying them critical needs. Ukraine and Russia are huge wheat exporters, we can make up the difference by diverting some of the acreage used to produce corn for ethanol, which does nothing for the environment, but we do not and will not have the political will to make that happen...
 
Top