Season proficiency ratings title contenders

Tenn"cock said:
LOL. Don't let a coincidence go to your head. Remember, context is everything.
Click to expand...
Well to be fair (abd I am fair) it most likely pertained to the 2016 season if it said 2017. Meaning I'm still in the the dark about the spotlight, where it shines and whatnot. But my point remains the same. You ought to review the dara set I posted fir verification. It should tell everything you could possibly want to know about a NC.
With respect to 2016 it was Alabama's Championship to lose, which unfortunately they did. But had CFP not beenr involved they woiuld ghqve carried tye Belr into 2017. The Belt was in the line against Clemson. Obviously, Clemson won the Belt.
 
CollegeFBFan2021 said:
Well to be fair (abd I am fair) it most likely pertained to the 2016 season if it said 2017. Meaning I'm still in yye the dark about the spotlight, where it shines and whatnot. But my point remains the same. You ought to revire
Click to expand...

And you need to realize there is no belt without a wristband.
 
Tenn"cock said:
And you need to realize there is no belt without a wristband.
Click to expand...
Actually I almost never wear a Belt. When I was in high school I did. To support know lower back while engaged in weightlifting. I was mostly a pussy when it came to working out. I could squat my weight and bench press my wright and I was of a slight build. I wasn't especially strong or smarr.
 
Tenn"cock said:
And you need to realize there is no belt without a wristband.
Click to expand...
I never wear wristbands. Are you a product of the seventies? It reminds me of thst movie with Will Ferrell the American Basketball League. He was rocking the headband. As I recall. Remember? I do
 
CollegeFBFan2021 said:
I never wear wristbands. Are you a product of the seventies? It reminds me of thst movie with Will Ferrell the American Basketball League. He was rocking the headband. As I recall. Remember? I do
Click to expand...

Pepperidge Farms remembers

will-ferrell_crop_exact.jpg
 
Tenn"cock said:
And you need to realize there is no belt without a wristband.
Click to expand...
I think I do acknowledge that. In fact relative to the cause, even though I've yet to post the result, the simple fact IS beyond question, particular to my method (assuming I can take credit for something I initiated). Co-champions 1984. Brigham Young and Florida. It probably shouldn't surprise anyone. I can't take credit for another's accomplishment. But neither are independently qualified, but together they breach the outer barrier. The Fourth Wall.
A little irony as well. Florida can't independently claim 1996, either. Brigham Young also carries a measure of it into 1997.
God must have a sense of humour.
Bottom line: It's pointless to pretend one team necessarily stands superior to another. Admittedly, Brigham Young requires assistance. But Iowa can't completely close the gap. Only to 96%. Likewise, Florida requires assistance, but L.S.U. (largely a consequence of them having lost to UNL). Only gets them (Florida) as far as Iowa.
Meaning, for EITHER to claim ANY part of it they are have to surrender to the other.
It's funny. Irs a little like karma. Florida can't claim a NC without Brigham Young's assistance. And vice versa. (1984 & 1996).
 
CollegeFBFan2021 said:
I think I do acknowledge that. In fact relative to the cause, even though I've yet to post the result, the simple fact IS beyond question, particular to my method (assuming I can take credit for something I initiated). Co-champions 1984. Brigham Young and Florida. It probably shouldn't surprise anyone. I can't take credit for another's accomplishment. But neither are independently qualified, but together they breach the outer barrier. The Fourth Wall.
A little irony as well. Florida can't independently claim 1996, either. Brigham Young also carries a measure of it into 1997.
God must have a sense of humour.
Bottom line: It's pointless to pretend one team necessarily stands superior to another. Admittedly, Brigham Young requires assistance. But Iowa can't completely close the gap. Only to 96%. Likewise, Florida requires assistance, but L.S.U. (largely a consequence of them having lost to UNL). Only gets them (Florida) as far as Iowa.
Meaning, for EITHER to claim ANY part of it they are have to surrender to the other.
It's funny. Irs a little like karma. Florida can't claim a NC without Brigham Young's assistance. And vice versa. (1984 & 1996).
Click to expand...


I can see now I am going to have to develop my own system. NO WHERE in that wall of text does it even mention wristbands!
 
Tenn"cock said:
LOL. Don't let a coincidence go to your head. Remember, context is everything.
Click to expand...
It says at the very least a Belt exists doesn't it? I remember one being galavanted during L.S.U.'s Championship. Clearly it's measurable. I obviously am not the proprietor. I never sanctioned a Belt. But it's fun to talk about. Two games in 1985 were Belt is title to pairings. BYU vs. U.C.L.A. (as top billing that U.C.L.A. emerged victorious in. And the Aloha Bowl. Notable because tye previous year (pairing between S. Methodist and Notre Dame). Had similar ramifications.
Bottom line: if, in FACT Oklahoma was a national champion in 1985 by beating the second best team in a title game, by a similar stroke of luck, so ought to have been Brigham Young. As they defeated A.F.A. Clearing room, obviously for Oklahoma, who otherwise is insufficiently qualified. F.W.I.W.
 
Tenn"cock said:
I can see now I am going to have to develop my own system. NO WHERE in that wall of text does it even mention wristbands!
Click to expand...
You can purchase wristbands. I don't get involved in the merchandising. Maybe I should? I worked as a merchandiser for Coca-Cola. I was a merchandiser. 1999. I was responsible for merchandising soda-pop. It coincided with the Super Bowl. 1999. Coca-Cola is head quartered in Atlanta, Georgia. Salt Lake City was the main distribution center. I love Coke. I doubt I'm alone. Coca-Cola.
 
Tenn"cock said:
LOL. Don't let a coincidence go to your head. Remember, context is everything.
Click to expand...
I deal with contextual issues. Better, I think than most What in particular are you suggesting? I admitted I don't award the Belt. It wasn't my idea, and I wasn't the initiator from which it came into being. It exists independently to anything I think, say or do. I admitted it was fractured in 2017. Pittsburgh actually secured the Belt, but the irony is it was still (a measure of it, anyway) appropriated by CFP. In the Championship! I think maybe we are getting closer to an agreement.
It doesn't matter if people like or agree with me. If it makes you happier not to, don't!
I'm simply saying there's a protocol in place. One I thinik has merit to it
So instead of focusing on every Tom and Harry Dick in the universe, we can focus on as many as eight viable contenders.
Champions, all! Not pretenders, contenders!
Alabama, Clemson, Ohio St., Texas A&M..
Oklahoma, Mississippi, Iowa and Georgia.
I think taking the focus off the title and onto the titleists is an intelligent way to connect. It should solidify the championship.
 
Last edited:
CollegeFBFan2021 said:
It says at the very least a Belt exists doesn't it? I remember one being galavanted during L.S.U.'s Championship. Clearly it's measurable. I obviously am not the proprietor. I never sanctioned a Belt. But it's fun to talk about. Two games in 1985 were Belt is title to pairings. BYU vs. U.C.L.A. (as top billing that U.C.L.A. emerged victorious in. And the Aloha Bowl. Notable because tye previous year (pairing between S. Methodist and Notre Dame). Had similar ramifications.
Bottom line: if, in FACT Oklahoma was a national champion in 1985 by beating the second best team in a title game, by a similar stroke of luck, so ought to have been Brigham Young. As they defeated A.F.A. Clearing room, obviously for Oklahoma, who otherwise is insufficiently qualified. F.W.I.W.
Click to expand...

Indeed. I admit I was surprised when I saw that champion wristband wearer also holding up what looked like a belt out of the WWE.

To be clear, I was just making sure you weren't trying to justify your entire system with a coincidental pic.
 
CollegeFBFan2021 said:
You can purchase wristbands. I don't get involved in the merchandising. Maybe I should? I worked as a merchandiser for Coca-Cola. I was a merchandiser. 1999. I was responsible for merchandising soda-pop. It coincided with the Super Bowl. 1999. Coca-Cola is head quartered in Atlanta, Georgia. Salt Lake City was the main distribution center. I love Coke. I doubt I'm alone. Coca-Cola.
Click to expand...

Weird, I used to work for Koch. ( as in I worked for a Charles Koch company for 5 years called Koch Business Solutions ).
 
CollegeFBFan2021 said:
I deal with contextual issues. Better, I think than most What in particular are you suggesting? I admitted I don't award the Belt. It wasn't my idea, and I wasn't the initiator from which it came into being. It exists independently to anything I think, say or do. I admitted it was fractured in 2017. Pittsburgh actually secured the Belt, but the irony is it was still (a measure of it, anyway) appropriated by CFP. In the Championship! I think maybe we are getting closer to an agreement.
It doesn't matter if people like or agree with me. If it makes you happier not to, don't!
I'm simply saying there's a protocol in place. One I thinik has merit to it
So instead of focusing on every Tom and Harry Dick in the universe, we can focus on as many as eight viable contenders.
Champions, all! Not pretenders, contenders!
Alabama, Clemson, Ohio St., Texas A&M..
Oklahoma, Mississippi, Iowa and Georgia.
I think taking the focus off the title and onto the titleists is an intelligent way to connect. It should solidify the championship.
Click to expand...

Until you recognize the World Champion Wristbands of my beloved Gamecocks then I cannot recognize anything called Relative Proficiency.

I think I will call my system Whimsical Contingency.

So far, applying my system, I have found that South Carolina holds more wrist bands than any other team. you should see the wristband they won for the 1984 championship.

6QZTJ7VUYZBGJIFVFACI7ZRT54.jpg
 
Tenn"cock said:
Until you recognize the World Champion Wristbands of my beloved Gamecocks then I cannot recognize anything called Relative Proficiency.

I think I will call my system Whimsical Contingency.

So far, applying my system, I have found that South Carolina holds more wrist bands than any other team. you should see the wristband they won for the 1984 championship.

6QZTJ7VUYZBGJIFVFACI7ZRT54.jpg
Click to expand...
Is that the sane wristband they lost to Navy with? You are aware they were given a shot of redemption? Were paired against Oklahoma St. Were beaten and left with two losses on tye year, effectively eliminating them entirely as a consequence.
Two losses eliminates a team from consideration. Georgia was eliminated by Alabama in 2107. Nit because of a playoff although I'm sure some will try to prove differently. They were 13-2 ion tye year. 12--1-2 but that's actually identical to 13-2. Meaning it's the same methodology as before. The best teams rise to the surface.
 
Tenn"cock said:
Until you recognize the World Champion Wristbands of my beloved Gamecocks then I cannot recognize anything called Relative Proficiency.

I think I will call my system Whimsical Contingency.

So far, applying my system, I have found that South Carolina holds more wrist bands than any other team. you should see the wristband they won for the 1984 championship.

6QZTJ7VUYZBGJIFVFACI7ZRT54.jpg
Click to expand...
Like I said, but for having lost to Navy you make an excellent point! The cold hard reality is they surrendered whatever claim they might otherwise have had to the Midshipmen. Who, in turn, surrendered it to Army. Who were, in fact quite credible a team. Both seasons. But, inferior, it would seem to anyone holding the Belt. Although admittedly it might have made a good pairing in retrospect against U.C.LA. But I'm mostly glad with how things went. U.C.L.A. secured the Belt and I believe Notre Dame secured whatever it was Army secured. Following season but it made S. Methodist's win against Notre Dame (Aloha Bowl) all the sweeter. Brigham Young required assistance. They hadn't beaten Notre Dame but had beaten S. Methodist. Aloha Bowl.
Actually a lot hinged on S. Methodist.
Lost to Houston and to Texas. Texas lost to Iowa. Houston lost to Boston College. Boston College (following year) lost to Brigham Young University. Opening game. 28-14. In YOUR twisted world it would appear to ME we gave a co- championship.
Brighton Young and Iowa. Your rules, obviously. Apparently they were wearing shoulder pads. Us that your metric? J/W.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top